When parties agree to settle a commercial dispute, the next step is to record that agreement clearly and establish when it becomes binding. Agreement on a payment figure may leave important questions unanswered: which claims are being released, who will pay the legal costs and what happens if payment is late?
At Sherwin O’Riordan, we approach settlement documentation with those practical consequences in mind. The terms should reflect the agreement reached and provide a workable route to completion and enforcement.
Depending on the circumstances, the settlement may be recorded in binding heads of terms, a detailed settlement agreement or a mediation settlement. Where court proceedings are underway, an agreed court order may also be appropriate. Each document has a different role, and the parties should understand its effect before signing.
The first point to establish is whether the parties have reached a binding settlement or an agreement in principle that remains subject to further documentation.
That distinction should be addressed during negotiations. A business should not assume that an agreement is non-binding simply because the parties intend to prepare a longer document later. Equally, agreement on the settlement amount may leave significant terms unresolved.
When advising on a commercial settlement, we consider the obligations needed to complete the deal, any necessary approvals and the consequences if completion does not take place.
Where commercial litigation is already underway, the settlement must also address the proceedings. Preparing an agreement does not, by itself, suspend court deadlines or remove obligations under existing orders.
Heads of terms record the principal elements of a settlement. They may identify the payment amount, payment dates, claims being resolved and any further steps required.
They can be useful at the conclusion of negotiations or mediation, particularly where share transfers, security documents or other completion arrangements still need to be prepared.
However, heads of terms are not automatically non-binding.
The document should therefore state whether the parties intend to be bound immediately or only when a formal settlement agreement is executed.
If certain provisions are intended to bind immediately, while others remain conditional, that distinction should be explicit. Confidentiality obligations, for example, may need to operate while the substantive settlement remains subject to contract.
Appropriate “subject to contract” wording can help express an intention to remain unbound pending a formal agreement. However, the document as a whole and the surrounding circumstances still require careful consideration.
No. Without-prejudice protection and the enforceability of an agreement are separate issues.
Without-prejudice protection concerns the use of genuine settlement communications as evidence. It does not, by itself, prevent the parties from reaching a binding agreement through those communications.
For mediated settlements, section 11 of the Mediation Act 2017 provides that a mediation settlement has effect as a contract, except where it expressly states that it has no legal force until incorporated into a formal legal agreement or contract signed by the parties. This is subject to the safeguards contained in that section.
A short document signed at the end of mediation may therefore have substantial legal consequences. Its effect should be understood before it is signed.
A commercial settlement agreement should be tailored to the dispute and the arrangements needed to resolve it.
We consider who must be bound, what each party must do and how the obligations fit together. The agreement will usually address payment, releases, costs, confidentiality, default and the treatment of any court proceedings.
It may also need to cover the return of property, termination or continuation of contracts, share transfers, intellectual property, guarantees or ongoing cooperation.
Identifying the correct parties is essential. A director signing on behalf of a company does not necessarily become personally responsible for the company’s settlement obligations. If a personal guarantee or an obligation from another group company is required, it needs appropriate documentation.
The agreement should also identify the governing law and the arrangements for resolving any dispute about the settlement itself.
A release identifies the claims a party agrees to give up.
The words “full and final settlement” should be supported by provisions explaining precisely what is being settled. Resolving a particular court claim is different from releasing all claims under a contract or a wider category of disputes.
When considering a release, we examine whether it covers both the claim and any counterclaim, whether it is mutual and whether any rights or continuing obligations must be preserved.
The timing also matters. A release that takes effect immediately on signature may have different consequences from one that becomes effective only after payment or completion.
The agreement should preserve the right to enforce its own terms. It should also address any relevant rights involving insurers, guarantors or other parties. A settlement between two businesses should not be assumed to resolve every third party’s position.
Payment provisions should leave little room for disagreement about the amount due or when it must be paid.
The agreement should specify the amount, currency, payment method and due dates. If payment depends on another event, such as a share transfer or execution of a document, that event should be clearly defined.
It should also state whether the agreed amount includes interest, legal costs and any applicable VAT.
Where instalments are proposed, we consider the commercial risk of deferred payment and whether security or a guarantee is appropriate. The document should explain what happens if an instalment is missed, including any notice requirements, opportunity to remedy the default and interest payable.
If the parties intend a missed instalment to make future instalments immediately payable, that requires an appropriately drafted acceleration provision.
Legal costs should be addressed expressly, including any existing costs orders.
The parties may agree to bear their own costs, provide for a contribution or leave the amount to be determined through an agreed assessment process.
Where the settlement sum is inclusive of costs, the agreement should explain what that includes. Mediation fees, expert fees, disbursements and VAT may require separate consideration.
Any agreed court order should be consistent with the settlement agreement. Leaving costs unresolved can prolong a dispute after the substantive issues have been settled.
A confidentiality clause should identify the information protected and the people or organisations bound by the obligation.
It may cover the settlement terms, payment amount or specified information relating to the dispute. It should also provide appropriate exceptions, including disclosures required by law and those needed for legal advice, tax advice, insurance arrangements or enforcement.
Mediation confidentiality has statutory limits. Section 10 of the Mediation Act 2017 permits disclosure in specified circumstances, including where necessary to implement or enforce a mediation settlement. Evidence does not become privileged merely because it was used in mediation.
Where proceedings have been issued, we also consider what will need to be disclosed to the court. A private confidentiality clause should not be treated as a guarantee that every aspect of the settlement will remain private.
Non-disparagement and confidentiality address different concerns.
Confidentiality restricts disclosure of specified information. A non-disparagement clause addresses statements about another party and may be relevant where reputational concerns form part of the settlement.
The wording should explain what statements are covered, who is bound and what exceptions apply. A company’s obligations should take account of its ability to control communications by its representatives.
The parties may also agree a public statement or a response to enquiries, reducing uncertainty about how the outcome will be communicated.
Neither confidentiality nor non-disparagement provisions should purport to prevent lawful protected disclosures. Section 23 of the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 makes contractual provisions void insofar as they prohibit or restrict protected disclosures or exclude the Act’s protections.
Not every commercial settlement requires a consent order.
Where court proceedings are underway, we consider how they should be concluded and whether an agreed court order, discontinuance, stay or another procedural arrangement is appropriate.
A consent order is an order made by the court on terms agreed by the parties. In the Superior Courts, Order 56A, rule 4 expressly permits the court to make an agreed order following mediation, including an order finally disposing of the proceedings, where all parties, including any third parties, agree.
The settlement agreement and any court order should work together. This is particularly important where payment or other obligations will continue after the agreement is signed.
Existing injunctions, undertakings and costs orders also need attention. A private settlement should not be assumed to vary a court order automatically.
The available enforcement route depends on the obligation breached, the settlement terms and any court order.
A breach of a settlement contract may require contractual enforcement proceedings. An obligation contained in a court order may be enforced through the procedures applicable to that order.
Section 11(3) of the Mediation Act 2017 provides for court enforcement of mediation settlements, subject to statutory grounds for refusing enforcement. Order 56A, rule 5 sets out the application procedure in the Superior Courts.
We consider enforcement when the agreement is being prepared. Notice requirements, interest, security and any agreed mechanism for seeking judgment should be addressed before a default occurs.
It should not be assumed that breach automatically revives the original claim. That depends on the agreement and how the proceedings were disposed of.
A commercial settlement payment should not be assumed to be tax-free.
Tax advice should be obtained before the agreement is finalised. The treatment depends on the nature of the payment, the rights or assets involved and the circumstances of the payer and recipient.
Revenue guidance confirms that certain capital sums derived from assets, including compensation payments, can give rise to a deemed disposal. Relief depends on satisfying the relevant conditions.
VAT requires separate consideration. Calling a payment “compensation” does not necessarily place it outside VAT.
Before signing, the parties should establish whether amounts are inclusive or exclusive of VAT, whether invoices or credit notes are required and whether withholding or other tax obligations arise.
Share or asset transfers may create additional tax consequences. Any allocation between elements of the settlement should reflect the underlying facts; the wording chosen by the parties does not conclusively determine Revenue’s treatment.
The final review should confirm that the document reflects the deal and can be implemented.
The correct parties must be included, signatories must have authority and necessary approvals should be obtained. Payment dates, completion steps and the timing of releases should be consistent.
Court documents should match the agreement, and responsibility for monitoring payment and other obligations should be clear.
These checks help ensure that the settlement resolves the existing dispute without leaving avoidable uncertainty about what happens next.
At Sherwin O’Riordan, we advise businesses on commercial litigation, mediation and negotiated dispute resolution. We can assist with recording agreed terms, considering payment and release provisions, and addressing the conclusion of court proceedings.
If your business has reached a proposed settlement, or you have been asked to sign heads of terms or a settlement agreement, contact us to discuss the legal and practical implications.
Understand how compensation is assessed
Real examples of successful outcomes
If you would like an immediate call back to discuss any queries, just fill in your details below. All correspondence is treated as confidential.
