Co-owning property with family, friends, or business partners often starts with shared aspirations and mutual trust. However, as life unfolds, circumstances can change, and what once seemed like a straightforward arrangement can devolve into complex disputes, especially when co-owners decide to sell the property.
Sherwin O’Riordan Solicitors frequently encounter situations where initial goodwill has evaporated, leaving co-owners at an impasse.
In this blog post, we explore the challenges of managing and selling a co-owned property when co-owners never established a formal co-ownership agreement. We use a pertinent Irish legal case to illustrate the potential pitfalls.
The initial acquisition of a co-owned property is often marked by optimism. Perhaps it’s a family home inherited by siblings, an investment property purchased by partners, or land acquired for a joint venture. In the excitement of the moment, or due to a lack of awareness, the crucial step of drafting a comprehensive co-ownership agreement is frequently overlooked. This omission, while seemingly minor at the outset, can become a significant source of contention down the line, especially when one or more parties wish to sell, and others do not, or when there are disagreements about the terms of sale.
Without a clear agreement outlining the rights and responsibilities of each co-owner, the process of selling a jointly held asset can become fraught with legal complexities. Key questions such as who bears the costs of maintenance, how profits or losses are to be divided, and, critically, the procedure for sale or dissolution of the co-ownership, remain unanswered. This ambiguity can lead to protracted negotiations, financial strain, and damaged relationships.
When co-owners cannot agree on the sale of a property, the legal recourse often involves an application to the courts for an order for partition or sale. The Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 significantly altered the landscape for co-owned property, replacing the previous, more complex, system of partition actions. Under Section 31 of the 2009 Act, any person who is a co-owner of land can apply to the court for an order directing the partition of the land, its sale and distribution of the proceeds, or other orders as the court thinks fit.
The court exercises broad discretion in deciding whether to order a partition or a sale. Generally, the court prefers a sale if it benefits the co-owners more than a partition would. The court considers factors such as the nature of the property, the number of co-owners, the extent of their shares, and any specific circumstances that might make a partition impractical or unfair. The court’s primary objective is to achieve a just and equitable outcome for all parties involved.
The recent case of Connolly and Dillon v Connolly and O’Connor serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of having a robust co-ownership agreement in place from the very beginning. A well-drafted agreement can prevent disputes, save significant legal costs, and preserve relationships. Such an agreement should, at a minimum, address the following key aspects:
Ownership Structure:
Clearly define whether the co-owners hold the property as joint tenants, where the surviving co-owners inherit ownership upon death, or as tenants in common, where each co-owner can pass their share on through their will.
Contributions and Expenses:
Detail each co-owner’s initial financial contribution and outline their ongoing responsibilities for mortgage payments, property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and repairs.
Decision-Making Process:
Establish a clear mechanism for co-owners to make decisions regarding the property, such as renovations, leasing, or, most importantly, selling. This mechanism could require unanimous consent, a majority vote, or a specific dispute resolution process.
Exit Strategy:
Outline the procedures for co-owners to sell their share, including rights of first refusal for other co-owners, valuation methods, and timelines. This approach is particularly vital in preventing forced sales or protracted legal battles.
Dispute Resolution:
Include provisions for mediation or arbitration to help co-owners resolve disagreements before resorting to costly litigation.
Death or Incapacity:
Address how a co-owner’s share transfers in the event of their death or incapacitation, aligning with their estate planning wishes.
By proactively addressing these issues in a formal co-ownership agreement, co-owners establish a clear roadmap for managing their shared asset, even when unforeseen circumstances or disagreements arise. This approach transforms potential conflicts into a structured process, ensuring that all parties understand their rights and obligations, and providing a clear path forward when they decide to sell or alter the ownership arrangement.
Sherwin O’Riordan Solicitors strongly advises anyone considering co-ownership, or those already in a co-ownership arrangement without a formal agreement, to consult with us at the outset. If it’s too late for that, seek our advice on how to pre-empt any possible fallout in the future.
Investing in a comprehensive co-ownership agreement from the start safeguards your interests and provides peace of mind in the long run.
If you would like an immediate call back to discuss any queries, just fill in your details below. All correspondence is treated as confidential.
